Skip to main content
Advertisement

US Military Kills Two in Pacific Strike on Alleged Drug Trafficking Boat

The US military killed two people in a strike on a boat in the eastern Pacific, part of a campaign targeting alleged drug trafficking vessels. Legal experts and civil rights groups challenge the legality and human rights implications of these operations.

·2 min read
Black and white video of drug boat

US Military Conducts Lethal Strike on Boat in Eastern Pacific

The US military announced on Friday that it killed two individuals in an attack on a boat in the eastern Pacific Ocean. This strike is part of a series of lethal operations targeting vessels in recent months, which the US claims are involved in "narco-trafficking" activities.

The US Southern Command (SouthCom) declared via a social media post on X that General Francis L. Donovan directed Joint Task Force Southern Spear, the counter-narcotics unit operating in the region, to execute the strike. The post included a video labeled as unclassified, showing a small boat being destroyed by an explosion.

Ongoing Campaign and Controversies

Since last September, the US campaign targeting boats in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific has resulted in at least 178 deaths. However, detailed evidence supporting military officials' claims that the targeted vessels were involved in drug trafficking has not been publicly provided. Legal experts have raised concerns that the US military may be violating both domestic and international laws through these attacks. Additionally, families of two men from Trinidad who were killed in previous strikes have initiated legal action against the government.

Ad (425x293)

SouthCom has consistently released social media posts in recent months announcing its strikes, often accompanied by low-resolution videos depicting vessels being destroyed in US military operations. The Trump administration has defended these actions, asserting compliance with the laws of conflict on the basis that the US is engaged in a war against drug cartels.

Former President Donald Trump has also justified the military campaign as necessary to prevent overdose deaths within the United States and to curb the influx of illicit drugs into the country.

"What we’re doing is actually an act of kindness,"
Trump stated last year regarding the strikes.

Legal Challenges and Human Rights Concerns

Civil rights organizations have pledged to challenge the legality of these deadly attacks through all available legal avenues, describing the US campaign as a blatant violation of human rights.

Jamil Dakwar, director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s Human Rights Program, issued a statement last month emphasizing their efforts:

"We are doing everything in our power to hold the Trump administration responsible for its egregious violations of both US and international law, and that includes asking the widely respected Inter-American Commission on Human Rights to investigate these heinous killings,"
he said.

This article was sourced from theguardian

Advertisement

Related News