Starmer's Speech and Its Impact on His Premiership
The critical question following Sir Keir Starmer's recent speech is whether it was sufficient to prevent a leadership challenge less than two years after his decisive general election victory.
Initially, the individual whose perspective on this matter holds the most significance—an assertion that might have seemed unusual just two days prior—is Catherine West.
West, who until recently was a relatively obscure former minister, expressed to the BBC on Saturday night her willingness to initiate a leadership contest if no other candidate emerged.
However, after hearing the prime minister's address, she has decided to withdraw her candidacy as a stalking horse and will not attempt to trigger a formal leadership contest at this time.
This development offers an immediate relief for Downing Street and for the Mayor of Greater Manchester, Andy Burnham, as West now supports the prime minister setting a timetable for his departure rather than an immediate exit. Burnham requires time to secure a return to Westminster first.
Organizers of the pro-Burnham movement were concerned over the weekend that a rapid contest would exclude Burnham, who is not currently an MP and must find a seat and win a by-election to qualify.
They sought to convince West to abandon her plan in favor of their own strategy, viewing her announcement as a significant victory.
The Atmosphere During the Prime Minister's Speech
The atmosphere during the prime minister's speech was tense, filled with loyalists encouraging Sir Keir. The event evoked memories of Iain Duncan Smith's 2003 Conservative leadership speech, delivered under intense pressure, where he declared, "the quiet man is here to stay and he's turning up the volume." Despite enthusiastic applause, Duncan Smith resigned three weeks later.
For Sir Keir's speech, attendance was sparse, with few MPs and no cabinet ministers present. Party Chair Anna Turley and Labour's Deputy Leader Lucy Powell occupied the front row.
Labour MPs' Reactions
The focus now shifts to Labour MPs. One MP sent an unsolicited text highlighting that the prime minister was introduced by a whip, responsible for party discipline, implying desperation.
"That speech made me feel sorry for the PM. He looks panicky and out of his depth. I watched that thinking of all my constituents who told me on their doorsteps in the last few weeks that he has to go and they won't vote Labour until he does. There was nothing there for them,"
While some MPs admired the prime minister's demeanor and rhetoric, those seeking a fresh policy agenda were left disappointed.
The announcement of the nationalisation of British Steel was new, though widely anticipated. However, several Labour figures noted that even this significant proposal came with a cautious caveat: "subject to a public interest test."
A much-anticipated segment on Europe merely reiterated existing government policy. Although some had advocated for it, there was no future manifesto commitment to rejoining the single market or customs union.
Critiques and Support Within the Party
Numerous MPs shared their assessments post-speech:
"That really didn't cut the mustard."
"He is damaging the party and the country."
"It was delivered like he was delivering a planning application."
"A waste of our time,"
and perhaps the most succinct reaction:
"meh".
Not all critiques came from longstanding opponents or those eager to challenge the leadership. An individual close to Sir Keir remarked on the absence of substantive policy on pressing issues:
"No substance on the cost of living - no pound in your pocket answers" and "nothing substantive on immigration and defence."
In other words, there is a perception that he has yet to demonstrate an ability to "rise to the moment."
Calls for an Orderly Transition
Approximately 40 MPs have publicly called for the prime minister's departure. Many advocate for a timetable facilitating an "orderly transition," aligning with Catherine West's current stance.
In numerous instances, an "orderly transition" is interpreted as a transition to Andy Burnham. Starmer's response after the speech regarding whether he would block Burnham's return to the Commons—as he did earlier this year—remained ambiguous.
This ambiguity may soon be clarified. If, as some supporters suggest, Burnham has a pathway back to Parliament via an MP willing to resign and trigger a by-election, the forthcoming hours and days are critical for making this known.
Potential Leadership Contenders
Finally, attention turns to Health Secretary Wes Streeting, another potential leadership contender. With West's challenge withdrawn, the catalyst for immediate discontent has dissipated.
The question arises whether Streeting possesses sufficient support and willingness to act, especially if it becomes more challenging to argue that Sir Keir's authority is eroding due to the absence of an active challenger.
One MP encouraged Streeting to pursue leadership, stating:
"It's not or never unless you're Burnham."
for our Politics Essential newsletter to keep up with the inner workings of Westminster and beyond.
