Disability Benefit Review Explores Alternatives to Cash Payments
There were protests against the Labour government's welfare reforms last year.
A major review of the primary disability benefit in England and Wales is examining whether some claimants could be offered alternative support instead of cash payments.
Sir Stephen Timms, the minister leading the review, informed MPs that the government would not be "moving away" from providing cash to disabled people to assist with their additional living costs.
However, the minister explained that the review is considering whether certain personal independence payment (PIP) claimants might be directed towards other types of support.
Alternatives to cash payments under consideration include NHS treatments, specialised equipment, or employment support.
In initial findings published this week, Sir Stephen's external review concluded that PIP is not functioning effectively for millions of disabled individuals and requires fundamental reform.
The interim report described PIP as "not fit for purpose," noting that applicants have characterized the process as "dehumanising" and a barrier to employment.
PIP claims, particularly for conditions such as anxiety and ADHD, have surged since the Covid-19 pandemic, increasing pressure on public finances.
Approximately 10 million working-age people (24%) report living with a disability, compared to under 17% in 2013/14.
The cost of PIP is projected to exceed £41 billion by 2030, rising from £15 billion in 2020.
The review recommends a comprehensive overhaul of the PIP assessment system.
A Department for Work and Pensions spokesperson stated that the review's final recommendations are expected this autumn and "will lay the foundation for deep, sustainable reform."
Review Co-Chair Comments on Assessment Process
On Thursday, Sharon Brennan, co-chair of the review, told the BBC that she and Sir Stephen are exploring ways to modify the PIP assessment process.
"At the moment, it's a very blunt process," Brennan said. "It's a yes or no answer, do you get cash or not, and we're not really having conversations with people about what extra support they need to live the lives they want to live."
She added that the review will examine whether the different levels of cash support available to PIP claimants "really reflects the real-life impact of disability" in 2026, emphasizing that increasing "participation in the workforce" will be a key aspect of any reforms.
Minister Affirms Importance of Cash Payments
Speaking in the House of Commons on Thursday, Sir Stephen affirmed that the review "is clear that the provision of cash to meet the additional costs of disability is vital."
"We will not be moving away from the importance of that, but I think there is a question about whether the process can also point people towards help that may be valuable to them in addition to, or in some cases perhaps instead of, a cash payment.
There is help and support that people need, and I think the process could help to point people to that."
He noted that the system "may be able to point people to the right place in the health service," adding that the review is "looking at all those issues and we will come back with recommendations in our final report."
The interim report states that the needs of disabled people and their additional costs "vary significantly, and the current system does not always recognise these differences or offer appropriate support."
Current PIP System and Claimant Statistics
PIP is a benefit for people with long-term illnesses and disabilities who require assistance with extra costs related to living, work, and care. Eligibility is determined through an assessment.
Under the existing system, claimants are scored on a zero to 12 scale by a health professional based on everyday tasks such as washing, dressing, and preparing food.
As of April, approximately four million claimants in England and Wales were entitled to PIP.
Background and Political Context
Sir Stephen's review was commissioned by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer following his government's attempt to reform welfare last year.
Dozens of Labour MPs expressed concerns about proposals to reduce disability and sickness-related benefit payments to save £5 billion annually by 2030.
Fearing that MPs would reject the reforms, the government reversed its position, stating it would not change PIP rules until the review's conclusions were considered.
Sir Stephen told the BBC that the review is not expected to make "crude proposals" regarding payment changes.
"But he said the financial sustainability of the benefit would 'be a concern as we reach these decisions.'"
His recommendations will be submitted to the next prime minister, who is almost certain to be Andy Burnham after he secured the support of the vast majority of Labour MPs in the first tally of party leadership nominations on Thursday.
Think Tank Proposals and Criticism of Current System
The Centre for Social Justice, a centre-right think tank founded by Conservative MP Iain Duncan Smith, has called for tightening mental health benefits to more severe cases to save an estimated £7.4 billion.
The think tank proposes allocating £1 billion of those savings to expand NHS talking therapies, treatment, and employment support.
"Britain is an international outlier in how reliant our system is on blunt cash payments," said Joe Shalam, policy director at the think tank.
He said hundreds of thousands of people with mental health conditions had been "parked and forgotten about" under the "broken status quo."
- Disability benefit not fit for purpose, minister leading review says
- How a rise in ADHD benefits claims is adding to welfare spending challenge
- Welfare cuts: What's been happening with PIP and universal credit?
