Pressure Mounts on Sir Keir Starmer Amid Leadership Concerns
This week marked a significant downturn in the outlook for Sir Keir Starmer regarding his future as prime minister.
Had you asked me two weeks ago about the mood among Labour MPs concerning Sir Keir's tenure in Downing Street, I would have said that the pressure from within the party seemed to have lessened.
Some speculated that following the prime minister's near political collapse in February — the moment when Energy Secretary Ed Miliband remarked that the party "looked over the precipice" — the appetite to revisit that brink had diminished, at least temporarily.
Labour MPs were still apprehensive, bordering on horror, about the upcoming elections across Britain scheduled for the following Thursday, but many expressed pride in how their leader was managing the Middle East conflict, and the intense leadership speculation had somewhat abated.
However, all this changed abruptly mid-afternoon last Thursday when published its investigation into Lord Mandelson's security vetting.
Since then, a relentlessly grim narrative, from the Labour Party's perspective, has dominated the news agenda, overshadowing any other topics they might prefer to highlight.
And this has occurred just days before critical elections to the Scottish and Welsh parliaments and numerous English local authorities.
Consequently, it is unsurprising that Labour members, from cabinet ministers downward, have been left feeling gloomy, exhausted, and frustrated.
Some of this discontent has been visible publicly.
Ministers participating in the morning media rounds — where they move from one studio to another, often armed with government announcements but also prepared for intense questioning on the day's headlines — have not concealed their frustrations as much as they might have in the past.
The aforementioned Ed Miliband, a former party leader, admitted on that when Lord Mandelson was appointed ambassador to Washington, he had concerns that "it could blow up" and had discussed these worries with cabinet colleague David Lammy, who shared them.
What is notable is not just that this was his view at the time, but that he is willing to express it publicly now.
"It was a fair point that enough was already known about Lord Mandelson when he got the job that it would have been possible to conclude at the time that his appointment was not just risky but wrong," Miliband said on Good Morning Britain.
Later in the week, Work and Pensions Secretary Pat McFadden appeared on multiple media outlets.
Typically a staunch defender of the government, he maintained that stance but sought to distance himself from the news that No 10 had been promoting their former director of communications, Lord Doyle, for an ambassadorial role.
Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper expressed even stronger disapproval, publicly condemning this particular revelation.
Each of these instances might be dismissed individually, but collectively they signal a decline in the prime minister's authority.
Then, during this week's cabinet meeting, ministers reportedly conveyed to journalists their concerns about the government's relationship with the Civil Service, particularly following the abrupt dismissal of the Foreign Office's top official, Sir Olly Robbins.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves and Health Secretary Wes Streeting were among those who voiced these concerns.
There is nuance here — the prime minister himself reportedly expressed worry as well.
Of course, cabinet ministers naturally worry about this relationship, as they work daily with their permanent secretaries and senior civil servants and depend on them to implement their policies.
Still, there was a subtle but clear willingness to publicize the consequences of No 10's actions.
We then saw Labour backbencher Jonathan Brash tell GB News that Sir Keir's time was up, while his colleague Dan Carden, speaking on night, was less direct but nonetheless stated, "there is definitely a question about the future of the Labour government."
The left-wing political magazine the New Statesman also contributed to the discourse. Its editor, Tom McTague, a thoughtful writer not prone to exaggeration, wrote of Sir Keir:
"The clamour is growing: he cannot do the job."
His article cited former Prime Minister Boris Johnson's public reflection on his own departure from Downing Street, when he said,
"when the herd moves it moves."
This refers to the parliamentary party, the essential electorate for any party leader, as it is the MPs who ultimately decide their fate.
This week, the Labour "herd" is murmuring; it is reconsidering its leadership.
Fundamentals Behind Labour's Leadership Challenges
It is important to remember that the core issues that led to Labour's significant instability over Sir Keir in February remain, as do the factors that allowed him to survive that crisis.
Let us examine these fundamentals individually: the government is deeply unpopular, and Sir Keir is even less popular.
This, combined with the perennial criticism from both supporters and opponents that the government lacks clear direction and purpose, is the primary reason Labour members question how much longer he should remain in office.
However, there is another fundamental to consider. The party has not reached consensus on a preferred successor, and many leading candidates face significant challenges.
Former Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner is currently engaged in a dispute with the tax authorities.
Andy Burnham, the Mayor of Greater Manchester, is not an MP.
Health Secretary Wes Streeting is attempting to distance himself from his previous association and friendship with Lord Mandelson.
The prospect of a leadership contest while in government alarms many Labour MPs, as critics would label it self-indulgent and inward-looking — and it would produce a new prime minister without an electoral mandate.
This situation resembles the classic philosophical paradox of an immovable object meeting an unstoppable force: logically impossible because the presence of one negates the other.
So far, the factors preventing the removal of the prime minister have outweighed those advocating for change.
The critical question now is whether this balance will shift when the Labour Party faces the likely harsh verdict of the electorate early next month.
for our Politics Essential newsletter to keep up with the inner workings of Westminster and beyond.
